logo

Analysis of Learning Resources Biology Book by Neil A. Campbell for class X SMA / Equivalent

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71131/fjf8bp02

Abstract

This study aims to determine the results of content analysis in the Biology book by Neil A. Campbell for class X SMA / equivalent using Science Literacy. This research method is descriptive qualitative with the research subject is the Biology book by Neil A. Campbell for class X SMA / equivalent. The research instrument is a book suitability analysis. Data collection is based on the results of the analysis conducted by researchers on Biology by Neil A. Campbell for class X SMA / equivalent based on science literacy content. Based on the analysis, the suitability of the Biology book by Neil A. Campbell for grade X SMA / equivalent seen from science literacy is categorized in the Science book as a body of knowledge (a body of knowledge).

Keywords:

Analysis, Content, Biology Book, Campbell and Science Literacy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, Prof. Dr. S. 2013. Manajemen penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi Revisi V. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Azizah, R. 2015. Analisis buku teks matematika kurikulum 2013 penerbit kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan untuk SMA kelas XI pokok bahasan statistika berdasarkan kriteria bell.

Bell, F. H. 1978. Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary schools). Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Beni, I. G., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Kristiani, A. I. 2013. Analisis buku matematics for junior high school grade VIII 1 st semester (bilingual) berdasarkan kriteria bell. KadikmA, 4(2).

Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H. 1991. “A Quantitative Analysis of High School Chemistry Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes and Expository Learning Aids”. Journal of research in science teaching. 28, (10), 939-951.

Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H. 1993. “Do Middle School Life Science Textbooks Provide a Balance of Scientific Literacy Themes?”. Journal of research in science teaching. 30, (2), 787 – 797

Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H.1991. “A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks”. Journal of research in science teaching. 28, (8), 713-725.

Cochran, W.G. 1991. Teknik Penarikan Sampel Edisi ketiga. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Direktorat Pendidikan Madrasah Departemen Pendidikan Agama. 2007. Tor Lomba Penulisan Buku Pelajaran “Mipa”. [Online]. Tersedia: www.depag.go.id. [15 Juli 2008].

Echols, J.M dan Shadily, H 1993. Kamus Bahasa Inggris-Indonesia Indonesia-Inggris. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Firman, H. 2007. Analisis Literasi Sains Berdasarkan Hasil PISA Nasional Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Depdiknas.

Fajriatin, A. 2017. Analisis buku matematika kelas IX kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan kesesuaiannya dengan materi matematika menurut kriteria bell dan pendekatan saintifik. PROSIDING, 67.

Hayat, B. 2003. Kemampuan Dasar Hidup: Prestasi Membaca, Matematika, dan Sains Anak Indonesia usia 15 tahun di Dunia Internasional. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Ikhwandi, I., Dafik, D., & Suciati, S. 2015. Telaah kesesuaian buku guru matematika kelas X kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan pendekatan saintifik. Pancaran Pendidikan, 4(1), 117–128.

KBBI, K. B. B. I. (2014). Kamus bahasa indonesia edisi terbaru. Pandom Media Nusantara.

Leonard, W.H dan Penick, J. E. (1993). “What’s Important in Selecting a Biology Textbooks?”. Journal of The American Biology Teacher. 55, (1), 14 – 19.

Lumpe, A. T dan Beck, J. (1996). A Profile of High School Biology Textbooks Using Scientific Literacy Recommendations”. Journal of The American Biology Teacher. 58, (3), 147 – 153.

Nur, M. 1995. Pemahaman tentang IPA dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi, Fisika dan Kimia FPMIPA IKIP. Disertasi doktor. Bandung: SPS IKIP.

OECD. (2003). Chapter 3 of the Publication “PISA 2003 Assesment of framework – mathematics, Reading, Science and problem solving knowledge and skills. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/29/33707226.pdf. [18 Juni 2008].

PISA. (2006). Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World Volume 1-analysis.OECD. [Online]. Tersedia: www.oecd.org/statistics/statlink. [ 8 Juli 2008].

Ramda, A. H. (2017). Analisis kesesuaian materi buku teks Kemendikbud matematika kelas VII dengan Kurikulum 2013. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 12–22.

Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 183–199.

Yusuf. S. (2003). Literasi Siswa Indonesia Laporan PISA 2003. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.p4tkipa.org. [18 Juni 2008].

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Liza Choirun Nisa, Lestari, J. W. ., Suwasono, P. R., Slamet, S., & Besi, Y. (2024). Analysis of Learning Resources Biology Book by Neil A. Campbell for class X SMA / Equivalent. International Journal of Sustainable English Language, Education, and Science, 1(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.71131/fjf8bp02