Research and Development in Accounting Science with a Qualitative Approach Methodology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71131/2544t390Abstract
The purpose of writing this article is to describe and deepen the study of qualitative interpretive accounting with various schools of thought, describe the advantages and limitations of interpretive accounting research and show the low level of qualitative interpretive research compared to quantitative research in Indonesia. The method used in this research is to use a qualitative approach with secondary data methods, namely through literature studies obtained from journals or articles that support. Positive/qualitative and interpretative/qualitative research models are complementary research models, there is no dichotomy between the two. The relationship between accounting and sociology and the continuous development of society is strong enough to underline the need to develop interpretative/qualitative research in accounting. The identification of research methods using solipsism, phenomenology, hermeneutics, ethnographic methodology, and symbolic interactionism is based on the ontological and epistemological assumptions of the research, for researchers to determine the most suitable method. So that qualitative research does not become a complement in the development of accounting science, it becomes a paradigm choice in developing research.
Keywords:
Accounting research , Qualitative approach , Interpretative methodDownloads
References
Al-Fayyadi, M. 2005. Deridda. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Atmadja, A.T. 2013. Pergulatan Metodologi Dan Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Ranah Ilmu Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pro- fesi, Vol. 3, No. 2.
Atmadja, N. Bawa. 2014. Saraswati Dan Ga- nesha Sebagai Simbol Paradigma Inter- pretivisme Dan Positivisme: Visi Integral Mewujudkan Iptek Dari Pembawa Musibah Menjadi Berkah Umat Manusia. Pustaka Larasan. Denpasar.
Atmadja, N.B. 2007. Bali Pada Era Globalisasi Pulau Seribu Pura Tidak Seindah Penampilannya. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Baker, C. 2004. Cultural Studies Teori dan Praktik. (Nurhadi Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Baker, C.R dan M.S. Bettner. 1997. Inter- pretive and Critical Research in Ac- counting: A Commentary on Its Ab- sence from Mainstream Accounting. Critical Perspective on Accounting, Vol. 8, hlm 293–310.
Berger, P.L. dan Th. Luckmann. 1992. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan. (Hasan Basari Penerjemah). Jakarta: LP3ES.
Bungin, B. 2003. Analisis Penelitian Kualitatif Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Burrell, G dan G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analy- sis: Elements of The Sociology of Cor- porate Life. Heinemann Educational Books. London.
Chua, W.F. 1986. Radical Development in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, hlm 601–632.
Djamhuri, A. 2011. Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Dan Berbagai Paradigma Dalam Ka- jian Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Mul- tiparadigma, Vol. 2, No 1, hlm 147–185.
Eriyanto. 2005. Analisis Wacana Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Faucault, M. 2002. Pengetahuan dan Metode Karya-karya Foucault. (Arief Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Faucault, M. 2002a. Arkeologi Pengetahuan. (H.M. Mochtar Zoerni Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Qalam.
Gadamer, H.-G. 2004. Kebenaran dan Metode Pengantar Filsafat Hermeneutika. (Ahmad Saidah Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Garfinkel, H. 1996. Ethnomethodology’s Program. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 59, No. 1, hlm 5–21.
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publisher.
Habermas, J. 2006. Teori Tindakan Komunikatif Rasio dan Rasionalisasi Masyarakat. (Nurhadi Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Hartono, J. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bis- nis Salah Kaprah Dan Pengalaman- Pengalaman. 6th ed. BPFE Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.
Hines, R D. 1992. Accounting: Filling The Negative Space. Accounting, Organization and Society. Vol.17. No. 3/ 4, pp.313-341.
Howard, R.J. 2000. Pengantar Teori-teori Pemahaman Kontemporer Hermeneutika Wacana Analitis, Psikososial, dan Ontologis. (Kusmana dan M.S. Nasrullah Penerjemah). Jakarta: Yayasan Adi Karya.
Irawan, P. 2006. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Adaministrasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, UI.
Johnson, P.D. 1992. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. (Robert M.Z. Lawang Penerjemah). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Kamayanti, A. 2015. "Sains" Memasak Akun- tansi: Pemikiran Udayana Dan Tri Hita Karana. in Pertemuan Masyarakat Akuntansi Multiparadigma Indonesia Nasional 3 (TEMAN3), vol. 3. Denpas- ar: Universitas Udayana, 26-27 Maret 2015.
Kirkham, L. M. 1992. Intergrating Herstory and History in Accountancy. Accounting, Organization and Society. Vol.17 No.3/ 4, pp.287-297.
Koentjaraningrat ed.1983. Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Leksono, A. W., Albertus, S. S., & Vhalery, R. (2019). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan dan profitabilitas terhadap agresivitas pajak pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listing di BEI periode tahun 2013–2017. JABE (Journal of Applied Business and Economic), 5(4), 301–314.
Lannai, D., M. Sudarma, G. Irianto, dan U. Ludigdo. 2014. Phenomenology Study About Performance Meaning At Indone- sia Foundation (Case Studies At Wakaf Foundation Of Indonesian Muslim Uni- versity). International Journal of Busi- ness and Management Invention, Vol. 3, No. 5, hlm 8–16.
Larkin, J. M. 1997. Upward Mobility in Public Accounting: A Gender-Specific Student Perspectives. Journal of Applied Business Research. Vol.13 No.2.
Lehman, C.R. 1992. Quiet Whisper, Men Accounting for Women: West to East. Accounting, Organization and Society. Volume 17, No. 3/ 4.
Leksono, S. 2013. Penelitian Kualitatif Ilmu Ekonomi Dari Metodologi Ke Metode. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Magnis-Suseno, F. 1990. “Pengantar”. Dalam J. Habermas, Ilmu dan Teknologi sebagai Ideologi. (Hassan Basari Penerjemah). Jakarta: LP3ES. Halaman viii-xxix.
Muhadjir, H.N. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Mulyana, D. 2001. Metologi Penelitian Kualitatif Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugroho, H. 2001. Uang, Rentenir dan Hutang di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Nugroho, H. 2004. Menumbuhkan Ide-ide Kritis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Palmer, R.E. 2003. Hermeneutka Teori Baru Mengenai Interpretasi. (Musnur Hery dan Damanhuri Muhammed Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Raffield, J. M. and F. J. Coglitore. 1992. Advancement in Public Accounting: The Effect of Gender and Personality Traits. Accounting Organization and Society. Volume 11
Raffield, J. M. and F. J. Coglitore. 1992. Advancement in Public Accounting: The Effect of Gender and Personality Traits. Accounting Organization and Society. Volume 11.
Sariroh, S. (2023). Management of Dual-Carer Couples in Maintaining Family Resilience and Harmony in Islamic Perspective. An-Nisa’: Journal of Gender Studies, 16(1), 139–152.
Syakur, A. (2023). BUDAYA ALIH KEPEMIMPINAN PERGURUAN TINGGI MUHAMMADIYAH (Studi Fenomenologi di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Syakur, A., Susilo, T. A. B., Mubarok, M. K., Riza, M. D., & Damyati, A. R. (2023). Sosialisasi Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis WEBS Dalam Pembelajaran ESP. Journal of Community Development, 3(3), 325–333.
Syakur, A., Syakur, A., Sugirin, S., & Margana, M. (2023). Interconnection of Cultural Literacy in Learning English and its Understanding as a Foreign Language in Higher Education. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 11(2), 1–8.
Setiawan, A.R, A. Kamayanti, dan A.D. Mu- lawarman. 2014. Pengakuan Dosa Sopir Angkuntan Pendidik: Studi Solipsismish. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Somantri, G.R. 2005. Memahami Metode Kualitatif. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 9, No. 2, hlm 57–65.
Strauss, A. dan J. Corbin. 2003. Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif Tatalangkah dam Teknik-teknik Teoritisi Data. (Muhammad Shodiq dan Iman Muttaqien Penerjemah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sudarma, I.M. 2010. Paradigma Penelitian Akuntansi Dan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm 97–108.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuanti-tatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sukoharsono, E. G. 2009. Refleksi Ethnografi Kritis: Pilihan Lain Teknik Riset Akuntansi. Audi Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Vol. 4 No. 1, Januari 2009. Halaman: 91-109.
Tomkins, C dan R. Groves. 1983. The Ev- eryday Accountant And Researching Further Thoughts His Reality ": Further Thoughts. Accounting, Auditing & Ac- countability Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, hlm 407–415.
Triyuwono, I. 2006. Perspektif, Metodologi, Dan Teori Akuntansi Syariah. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Wahyuni, S. 2015. Qualitative Research Method Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Wirajaya, I.G.D. 2012. Hermeneutika Dalam Interpretive Paradigm Sebagai Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, Vol. 7,
Yin, R.K. 2004. Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. (M. Djauzi Mudzakir Penerjemah). Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Zed, M. 2006. “Ilmu Sosial Indonesia dalam Wacana Metodenstreit”. Taufik Abdullah ed. Ilmu Sosial dan Tantangan Zaman. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Halaman 55-110.