Active Learning Strategies in Higher Education Biology: A Literature Review of Inquiry-Based Learning, Problem-Based Learning, and Flipped Classroom Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71131/wqrvrv15Abstract
Biology education in higher education faces significant challenges in fostering conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and scientific inquiry skills among students. Traditional teacher-centered instruction often positions students as passive recipients of information, limiting their engagement in knowledge construction. Consequently, active learning strategies have gained considerable attention as effective approaches to improve the quality of biology education. This review aims to examine the implementation of active learning strategies in higher education biology through three major pedagogical approaches: Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and the Flipped Classroom model. A literature review methodology was employed to synthesize findings from previous studies concerning the implementation of active learning in biology education. The findings indicate that Inquiry-Based Learning effectively enhances scientific reasoning, investigative skills, and conceptual understanding. Problem-Based Learning promotes critical thinking, collaborative learning, and the application of biological concepts to authentic problems. Meanwhile, the Flipped Classroom model encourages self-directed learning and optimizes classroom interaction through active discussions and problem-solving activities. Integrating these approaches provides a promising framework for developing meaningful, student-centered biology instruction that supports the acquisition of twenty-first-century competencies.
Keywords:
active learning, Biology education, Inquiry-Based Learning, Problem-based learning, Flipped classroom, Higher educationDownloads
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Anagün, Ş. S., & Yılmaz, F. G. K. (2022). The effectiveness of inquiry-based science education on students' critical thinking skills: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1255–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2058748
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on learning outcomes and student engagement. Education Sciences, 13(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040385
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9446-2
Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2022). Instruction based on inquiry and problem solving. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.). Elsevier.
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning: A systematic review and revision of Kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academies Press.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., ... Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
Wood, D. F. (2003). Problem based learning. BMJ, 326(7384), 328–330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328